Showing posts with label History of Colchester Chess Club. Show all posts
Showing posts with label History of Colchester Chess Club. Show all posts

Saturday, 4 June 2022

Simul game from 1981

Below is a game from a simultaneous display given in Colchester in Autumn 1981.

[Event "Simultaneous match"] [Site "?"] [Date "1981.11.29"] [Round "?"] [White "Basman, M."] [Black "Davies, W. J. N."] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A00"] [Annotator "Nathan"] [PlyCount "70"] [SourceVersionDate "2021.07.29"] 1. g4 {A move often played by IM Michael Basman who was well-known for his off-beat openings.} c5 2. Bg2 Nc6 3. h3 e6 4. c4 d5 5. Nc3 Nge7 (5... d4 { is better. While it opens the h1-a8 diagonal for White's bishop, the black pawns give White a cramped position.}) 6. Nf3 Ng6 7. d3 h6 8. Bd2 Be7 9. a3 a5 10. Rc1 b6 11. e4 d4 $6 (11... dxc4 12. dxc4 Nd4 13. Nxd4 cxd4 14. Nb5 e5 $17 { both of White's bishops are hemmed in.}) 12. Ne2 e5 13. Ng3 O-O 14. Nf5 Bxf5 15. exf5 Nf4 16. Bxf4 exf4 17. O-O Ra7 18. Re1 Qd6 19. Nd2 Bh4 20. Ne4 Qc7 21. Qb3 Ne5 22. Nd2 Bg5 23. Bd5 f3 $1 {Cutting off the bishop's retreat and pinning the d2 knight.} 24. Rcd1 (24. Nxf3 $2 Nxf3+ 25. Bxf3 Bxc1) 24... a4 $2 (24... Bxd2 $1 25. Rxd2 Nxg4 26. hxg4 (26. Bxf3 Qh2+ 27. Kf1 Qxh3+ $17) 26... Qf4 27. Bxf3 (27. Rc2 $4 Qxg4+ 28. Kf1 Qg2#) 27... Qxd2) 25. Qb5 $4 {Annotated on the original scoresheet as ?} Ra5 {The queen is trapped.} 26. Qxa5 bxa5 27. Ne4 Bf4 28. Rb1 Nxd3 29. Red1 Ne5 30. b3 Rb8 31. bxa4 Rxb1 32. Rxb1 Nd3 33. Rb7 Bh2+ 34. Kf1 Qf4 35. Rb1 Nb2 0-1

Thursday, 29 July 2021

HOCCC: 1904 correspondence match part 2

In the 1903-04 season two correspondence games were played between the chess clubs of Colchester and Tunbridge Wells. The first match can be found here. According to a newspaper article about the match "In game two White (Colchester) lost a pawn in the opening, but by using the knights to best advantage regained the pawn on move 20, and capturing two pawns shortly afterwards secured a winning advantage, black resigning on the 35th move. The Tunbridge Wells Chess Club is a strong one, having won the county trophy in Kent two years in succession. They also drew against Hastings, a notably strong club."

[Event "Correspondence match"] [Site "?"] [Date "1904.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Colchester"] [Black "Tunbridge Wells"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "D37"] [Annotator "Barnes, Nathan"] [PlyCount "69"] [SourceVersionDate "2021.07.29"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 Be7 5. Bf4 Nbd7 6. e3 O-O 7. c5 Ne4 8. Rc1 (8. Nb5 {is a meaningless threat.} c6 9. Nc7 e5 $1 10. Nxa8 Qa5+ 11. Nd2 exf4 { White's knight is trapped on a8 and will eventually be captured.}) 8... c6 9. Bd3 f5 10. O-O (10. h3 {Giving the bishop the option of retreating to h2 seems sensible.}) 10... g5 11. Be5 $6 (11. Bg3 {is the computer's suggestion to roughly maintain equality. On the surface it looks like it just loses a piece but an unbalanced material balance is the result.} f4 12. Bxe4 dxe4 13. Nxg5 Bxg5 14. exf4 Be7 15. Qg4+ Kf7 16. Qh5+ Kg8 17. Qg4+ Kh8 18. Qxe6 {White has lost a bishop but has a lot of pawns to compensate.}) 11... g4 12. Bxe4 dxe4 13. Nd2 Nxe5 14. dxe5 Qc7 15. b4 Qxe5 16. Nc4 Qg7 17. Ne2 Rd8 18. Qc2 e5 19. Qc3 $17 b5 $2 (19... Rd5 {holds onto the extra pawn and maintains black's advantage. Be6 and Rd3 are also fine.}) (19... Be6 20. Nxe5 $4 (20. Qxe5 $2 Qxe5 21. Nxe5 Bxa2) 20... Bf6) 20. Nxe5 $16 Bd7 $2 {Temporarily protecting the pawn on c6 but it doesn't work.} 21. Qb3+ $1 Kf8 22. Nxd7+ Rxd7 23. Qe6 Bf6 24. Qxc6 Re8 25. Nf4 Qf7 26. Qxb5 Rb7 27. Qc4 Be5 28. c6 Rc7 29. Qxf7+ Kxf7 30. a4 Bxf4 31. exf4 Rd8 32. Rc5 Kg6 33. b5 Rd3 34. a5 Rb3 35. g3 1-0

Saturday, 17 March 2018

HOCCC: 1904 correspondence match

In the 1903-04 season two correspondence games were played between the chess clubs of Colchester and Tunbridge Wells. According to a newspaper article about the match "In game one Colchester, playing Black, soon turned the attack into a defence, and at one time looked like winning, but White found the right replies, and a draw resulted."

[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "1904.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Tunbridge Wells"] [Black "Colchester"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "C54"] [Annotator "Barnes, Nathan"] [PlyCount "46"] {C54: Giuoco Piano: 4 c3 Nf6, main lines with 5 d4 and 5 d3} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 {The Giuoco Piano is an opening that has started to come back into fashion in recent years with quite a few of the top players using it.} (5. d3 {is the main line but 5.d4 is also a very common move.}) 5... exd4 6. e5 Ne4 (6... d5 {is the main move in this position, it has been played by Caruana recently against Gawain Jones.}) 7. Qe2 d5 {The only move that does not lead to material loss, the knight on e4 has nowhere to go.} 8. exd6 Bf5 (8... O-O {is also possible as the knight cannot be taken} 9. Qxe4 $4 Re8 10. Qe2 Rxe2+ 11. Bxe2 $19) 9. Ng5 $2 {Trying to win the knight but White would be better off taking on d4 and then developing on the queenside.} O-O $1 $17 {The only move to prevent material loss, the knight is safe due to the potential skewer of queen and king on the e-file.} 10. dxc7 Qxc7 11. O-O Rae8 12. Qf3 Bg6 13. Bf4 Ne5 {White is struggling - development is still not complete, the bishop on c4 is loose and vulnerable to potential discovered attacks from Black's queen and Black's pieces are much better coordinated.} 14. Bxe5 Rxe5 15. Nxe4 Bxe4 16. Qg4 Qe7 17. Qh3 (17. -- Rg5 $1 ( 17... Bxg2 {is also easily winning}) 18. Qh3 Rxg2+ 19. Qxg2 Bxg2 20. Kxg2 Qe4+ {and White will have to give up a lot of material to prevent mate.}) 17... b5 ( 17... Bxg2 $2 {doesn't work at the moment} 18. Kxg2 Rg5+ 19. Kh1 $11) 18. Bd3 { [%cal Rd3h7,Rh3h7]} (18. Bxb5 $4 Bxg2 $1 {[%csl Rf1,Rh3][%cal Re5g5]} 19. Kxg2 Qb7+ 20. f3 Qxb5 $19 21. b3 {while material is equal (temporarily), White's king is too exposed and the pieces not developed so won't be able to hold on for long.}) 18... g6 $6 {Doesn't achieve much. The idea is to unpin the bishop on e4 so that the tactics on g2 could work.} 19. Bxe4 {only move that keeps White in the game} ({for example} 19. Nd2 $2 Bxg2 20. Kxg2 Rh5 21. Qf3 Qg5+ 22. Qg3 Qxd2) 19... Rxe4 20. cxd4 Bxd4 21. Nc3 Bxc3 $6 $15 (21... Re5 $142 $17) 22. Qxc3 Re8 23. a3 a6 {Draw agreed} 1/2-1/2

Tuesday, 5 September 2017

Mate in two

The puzzle below was written in 1920 by Lionel Penrose of Colchester Chess Club. It is probably his best known puzzle and took 1st place in The Observer's puzzle competition. White to play and mate in two. Solution given in the comments section.

Saturday, 18 February 2017

History of the NECL

A number of recent posts have contained material taken from the booklet "History of the North Essex Chess League" by J. R. Priestley. This covers the period from before the NECL was formed in the 1960s to the mid-1980s. The entire booklet can now be read and downloaded from the historical archive which is on the About the club page on this website or by clicking here.

Tuesday, 14 February 2017

NECL Division 2: 1970/71


Final League Table 1970/71

Division 2


P
W
D
L
F
A
P
Colchester
6
3
3
0
14½
7½
9
Maldon
6
2
3
1
15½
8½
7
Wickford
6
3
1
2
11½
10½
7
Witham
6
2
2
2
11
13
6
Marconi
6
2
1
3
10
14
5
Braintree
6
1
2
3
10
14
4
Chelmsford
6
2
0
4
9½
14½
4



Chelmsford dominated the second division in the late 1970's and early 1980's but, as this table shows, things were rather different in 1971.

The match between Colchester and Wickford included two double defaults, which is why the aggregate of game points won and lost by the two totals 22 and not 24.
Colchester finished unbeaten for the second season in succession.

Friday, 13 January 2017

HOCCC: 1966-72 Rapid Development (of the North Essex Chess League) part 3

The material for this post is the sixth extract taken from the booklet "The History of the North Essex Chess League" by J. Priestley.



Ray Keene was elected president of the League, reflecting his visits to give simultaneous displays and his assistance with adjudications. The burden of work which fell upon the shoulders of the General Secretary had become very considerable with the introduction of the knockout competition and the expansion of the championship into two divisions, so separate officers of League Championship Secretary and Knockout Tournament Controller were created to spread the load. The first incumbents were John Standley of Colchester and Gareth Tucker of STL respectively.

Both STL and RAMC withdrew from the championship in 1971/72, and competed only in the Knockout. By so doing, they opened the way for a significant change in the operation of League competitions. Until then, every club had been expected to field its first team in the first division, and to enter the other competitions according to its wishes. But there now followed the rather more logical concept of clubs entering the competitions to which they were best suited. Withdrawal from the championship was a great disappointment for the players of STL, who had performed well enough to finish in mid-table in both of the two preceding seasons, and who on one occasion scored a sensational 5½ - ½ victory over Essex University. The departure of two or three key players was the reason for their enforced retirement from the premier event. Today's players who have been around long enough to have visited STL will remember not only the luxurious playing conditions but also the interesting novelty of a large blackboard on which results were entered as soon as games finished. This could have quite a demoralising effect on visiting teams unfortunate enough to suffer a couple of early reverses!

Voting rights at committee meetings, which had always been vested only in club representatives, were extended so as to include officers. This was a very logical step, as it was the officers who provided much of the continuity, some clubs changing the identity of their representatives fairly frequently.
RAMC departed at the end of the 1971-72 season, as did founder member Hoffmans, who had seen a steady decline in membership and who had latterly been reduced to a playing membership of seven.  Most people playing in the League today are unaware that at one time the whole concept of organised inter-club play in the area probably hinged on the ability of this gallant little club to subscribe to it. Every former club has played its part in the development of the League, but none more so than Hoffmanns. Although never in contention for honours, the club achieved several notable results. At one time or another wins were recorded against every other first division club, with the exception of Essex University, including a famous victory over mighty neighbours Chelmsford.

See also: Essex-Suffolk Border League, formation of the NECL, first two years of NECL

Tuesday, 3 January 2017

NECL Division One: 1966/67

Back in 1967 Colchester won Division One of the NECL, information taken from the History of the NECL booklet used for quite a few of the most recent posts. This was the third season in the competition and the second time that Colchester had won the league.


Final League Table 1966/67


P
W
D
L
F
A
P
Colchester
12
9
2
1
46
26
20
Chelmsford
12
8
1
3
47½
24½
17
Essex University
12
8
0
4
42½
29½
16
Braintree
12
6
2
4
37
35
14
Hoffmans
12
3
2
7
31
41
8
Maldon
12
4
0
8
31
41
8
Coggeshall
12
0
1
11
17
55
1


Full League tables were not published in the League's first two seasons so the above, showing the final outcome in the third season, was the first of its kind. Note that Hoffmanns and Maldon tied for fifth place, as both match points and game points were equal.

Thursday, 29 December 2016

HOCCC: 1966-72 Rapid Development (of the North Essex Chess League) part 2

The material for this post is the fifth extract taken from the booklet "The History of the North Essex Chess League" by J. Priestley.



The League's Individual Championship was divided into two sections, Premier and Challengers, and a total of 26 competed. It remained as two tournaments from then on although the entry did not expand in proportion to the increasing number of players taking part in the team competitions; and in subsequent years was often somewhere around the 20 mark and no higher. Players would meet in their own homes, or at club premises, so that a six round event was likely to require every contestant to make three journeys to an away venue. Journeys could be quite a distance for those living on the perimeter of the League's area, which may explain why the event was not as well supported as might have been expected. Another factor to take into account was that not all the entrants ran cars, especially in the early years. A fairly fanatical degree of enthusiasm was required for a player to take on the travelling commitments to remote places in the depths of winter.  Image the journey by train from Witham to Southminster via Shenfield and Wickford, an itinerary undertaken by Roy Heppinstall in order to play against Maldon's John Dodgson. A Braintree player faced an even more arduous journey, with three changes of train, if paired with the same opponent. It was not until 1984 that anybody had the idea of converting the event into a weekend tournament. Entrants were then only required to undertake two journeys, on successive days, to the venue and could benefit from the competitive atmosphere generated by all the players being congregated together. Certainly the idea was well received, for it attracted some 50 competitors, about double the usual number, and the event has been run in this way ever since.

A strange thing about chessplayers is that they do not seem to socialise with each other to any great extent outside the realms of the game itself. Two players can meet at matches on many occasions over several years, perhaps playing against each other a number of times, yet they are unlikely to meet at any other location and very often each will know very little about the other over and above the way he plays chess.  When the Individual Championship was converted to a weekend tournament it was held at the Sportsman Club in Braintree, where the facilities provided the ideal opportunity for players to get together for activities completely unrelated to chess. Many competitors took full advantage, thus making the event into a useful social gathering as well as a tournament. Any passer-by who happened to see Colchester's Andy Lingard arriving at the venue with snooker cue in hand would probably have needed a lot of convincing that he was there to compete in the area's individual chess championship! By now the Individual was no longer being run as two separate tournaments. Instead it was run as one event with the Challengers Trophy being awarded to the player graded 140 or below who achieved the best score.
League Individual Championship 1968/69
Premier
Points

5
J. A. Dodgson, B. Beavis, A. F. B. Scibor
4½
J. R. Priestley
4
R. Heppinstall
3½
E. Whitehead, A. J. Lait, L. Frain
3
D. R. Gold, K. Lucas
2½
B. J. Hunt, P. C. Elliott
2
D. F. Imrie, F. M. Spiers

Challengers
Points

6½
S. Simpson
5½
P. Lawrence
5
H. A. Travers, C. Vince
3½
V. Goetz
3
P. Hewlett, P. W. Selfe
2½
W. H. Parker
2
C. E. Smith, E. G. Tribe, I. Rumsey
1
S. D. George






Marconi won the championship in 1968/69 to begin a period of domination which extended well into the 1970's. Colchester began a similar period of ascendency in the second division.


In the following season, 1969-70, Wickford and STL joined the League. Wickford had been regarded as prospective members ever since the League was founded, and the eventual arrival of the club brought to fruition the links which had been forged and nurtured over a period of years. The club had joined the Essex League in 1964, but by 1968 the eastern section of that League's third division had been decimated by the withdrawal of Burnham, Ghyllgrove and the Basildon town club. A change of direction had been called for, and the club turned to its old friends in the north for the active competition it so keenly sought. Wickford can claim to have quite a lot in common with Braintree, for not only do both clubs have a solid nucleus of experienced and long serving players quite capable of beating the very best opposition on their day, but also both can justifiably say that playing performance is not accurately reflected in the list of League honours which appears at the end of this book. Such lists are, of course, always about winners rather than those who came close. In their very first match Wickford defeated champions Marconi, their only first division defeat of that season, and went on to finish third. They were also third the following season only two points behind the winners. Often they made a good start to a season, only to fall away later, another characteristic shared with Braintree. Wickford's challenge for honours was, perhaps, strongest in its earliest years of membership when there was no club in the neighbouring town of Billericay. When the chessplayers of Billericay decided the town was quite big enough to support a club of its own some depletion of Wickford’s potential was perhaps inevitable, but always they have remained highly respected opponents never to be taken lightly by the opposition.

The other newcomers, STL, were chessplaying employees of Standard Telecommunications Laboratories, a company based in the far west of Essex at Harlow. The fact that the club's application for membership was so keenly submitted, and received, speaks volumes for the high level of enthusiasm which existed on both sides, for the club faced a journey of at least 20 miles to each away match and a similar journey confronted every other club for the return fixture. As it happened, home and away fixtures were discontinued after the previous playing season, so any given journey was no longer scheduled to take place every season, but every other season instead, which was not quite so daunting. On the other hand, the Knockout Tournament was introduced at this time, so the luck of the draw could cause the same journey to occur twice in the same season, and would inevitably do so for some.

For the first few years the Knockout was run on a similar basis to football's World Cup Finals, with the teams divided into groups and with each group conducted on an all-play-all basis to produce qualifiers for the later rounds, which were run as a straight knockout. Then, as now, the tournament was for teams of four and most clubs entered more than one team. The tournament was structured in this manner so as to guarantee each team a certain number of fixtures before possible elimination, thus compensating for the reduction in the number of championship fixtures resulting from the discontinuation of the home and away system. The tournament threw together players from the entire range of playing strength, and thus offered to second division players the chance to meet first division opponents over the board. This enabled the tournament to take on some of the romance associated with the F.A. Cup, for "giant-killings" soon became a regular feature. 'A' teams were often toppled by 'B' opponents and, now and again, by 'C' category players as well. Even the mighty Chelmsford A once lost to Braintree C. To add even more spice to the event the rate of play was accelerated to 35 moves in 1¼ hours as opposed to the 30 required in the championship. This was designed not only to give the tournament its own identity, but also to reduce the number of unfinished games requiring to be adjudicated.

Nineteen teams competed in the first season. Although the rules provided for tie breaks in the event of 2-2 match results in the Knockout rounds, this did not extend to the final itself. The two finalists, Essex University and Wickford, the latter's strength being a further endorsement of the club's strength in its early years of membership, promptly succeeded in drawing the match and, accordingly, shared the title. This was a remarkable result from the University's point of view, because an unforeseen chain of events obliged them to arrive with only three players and one board was thus lost by default. The rules were later altered to provide for a reply in the event of a drawn match in the final. To date, the amended rule has always produced an outright winner, and the tie of the first season remains unique.

1970 saw arrivals in the form of Writtle and a team from the Royal Army Medical Corps at Colchester. RAMC was another small club owing existence to a temporary preponderance of players in a small community. The club competed for only one season in the championship, where the exploits of leading player Doug Pallett were never going to be enough to disguise the deficiencies in playing strength further down the team. Only six game points were won in the entire season, but as three of them were gained in the same match the indignity of finishing without a single match point was avoided. Writtle also struggled in their opening campaign, but for them a bright future lay ahead. The principal pioneers of Writtle club were Ivor Smith and Len Frain, the league's first secretary who, as a serving police officer, had been stationed at both Braintree and Colchester, and represented both, before moving on to Writtle. He thus had the rare distinction of playing a part in the establishment of two clubs, Braintree and Writtle.
The distribution of honours was becoming very much to a set pattern with Marconi and Colchester carrying off the first and second division championships respectively for the third successive season. Not for the first time, though, the margin of victory for Marconi was game, rather than match, points. Clubs frequently found themselves separated by such slender margins after a whole season of competition. It was often a mistake for a player to concede half a point to his opponent once a match result had been settled, rather than to play on and, if necessary, opt for adjudication. Sometimes, at the end of a season, odd half points so conceded could make all the difference between honours or merely coming close to them. Marconi also won the Knockout in 1970-71 and became the first club to achieve the 'double'. So great was the domination of the club that the feat was promptly repeated in the following season.

See also: Essex-Suffolk Border League, formation of the NECL, first two years of NECL,1966-1972 part 1

Tuesday, 25 October 2016

HOCCC: 1966-72 Rapid Development (of the North Essex Chess League) part 1

The material for this post is the fourth extract taken from the booklet "The History of the North Essex Chess League" by J. Priestley.


1966-72 Rapid Development
When the tide turned, it did so quickly. Not only did both Hoffmans and Coggeshall pledge to carry on, for one season at least, but also applications for membership came in from newly formed groups at Maldon and Essex University. Oddly enough, the University had long been regarded as a likely candidate for membership, but previous approaches had produced no indication of any chess activity. Now, suddenly, the players were there. Naturally, both applications were eagerly accepted.
The season 1966-67 was unquestionably the most significant in the League's entire history. In the preceding summer there had been doubt whether membership would be sufficient to enable a proper competition to be run, but the season had actually run with a record seven clubs competing, and in the following summer preparations were in hand for the formation of a second division as well as the admission of two more new clubs, namely Witham and Marconi. ln addition, representative matches had been played against Ilford Chess Club, at that time the strongest club in the County, and the Suffolk League, and match play rules had been comprehensively formulated to replace the somewhat brief and basic rules which had operated since the League was formed.  Quite a transformation!
From then on the future of the League was assured, and apprehensions concerning survival were finally banished from mind. Though purely academic, it is interesting to speculate on what would have happened had events taken a different course in the summer of 1966. If neither Maldon nor Essex University had materialised, and both Coggeshall and Hoffmanns had withdrawn, could the three remaining clubs have ensured the League's survival? It is almost certain that competition between the three would have continued, for the players enthusiasm would have been sharpened by the outcome of the preceding season's championship where the clubs had been in such close contention. Perhaps each club would have met the others three, or even four, times a season rather than twice so as to expand the fixture programme. But would competition of this nature, which could hardly be described as a proper league, have continued for very long if no new blood had been forthcoming? It seems reasonable to suppose that enthusiasm would have declined in the face of a prolonged series of meetings between the same three opponents, for inevitably they would not have remained so well balanced in playing strength and results would have become predictable. Had this led to the discontinuation of organised competition, the belief that the area could not support league chess would have been firmly implanted in the minds of the principal characters, especially having regard to the demise of the Border League not long before, and it might have been a long while before anyone was ready to try again.
It is also valid to consider the situation from a different viewpoint by asking how enthusiastic a new club would have been to join a league having only three members, especially if that club happened to be in the south of the area and within reach of the greater variety and security offered by the Essex Chess League.
Such apprehensions may seem far-fetched when viewed from the haven of today's thriving activities, but they were real enough then. Nobody knew that the arrival of Essex University. Maldon, Marconi and Witham and those who followed was so soon to occur, but everyone was aware that organised club chess had never previously taken sufficient root so as to remain permanent in the area. In the minds of the committee of the day the League had, for a short while, stood on the very brink of what might easily have been an irreversible slide into oblivion.
This most eventful of seasons ended with Colchester winning back the championship. Not many people would have expected this to be the club's last triumph in the championship for several years to come for the team was certainly imposing, including as it did the powerful juniors Congdon, Buis and Rose. Tim Congdon was to go on to represent England in the Glorney Cup and later attain a grading of over 200. Unfortunately for Colchester, all three were destined to leave the area in pursuit of further education and only Mike Rose was to return, and then only for a short while. The club has rarely featured prominently in the first division since but has often done well in the second, especially in the early years of that competition.
Also, in that significant season of 1966/67, the League held its first general meeting since its formation. A proper constitution was adopted providing for annual general meetings to be held in future at which officers would be obliged to offer themselves for re-election by the League's players as a whole, rather than to serve indefinitely under appointment by the committee. Such meetings also afforded every player a direct relationship with the running of the League and the opportunity to put forward his suggestions.
Coggeshall withdrew before the start of the 1967/68 season. As with Wethersfield, their tenure of league status had been short, but their contribution to the promotion of competitive chess in the area had been invaluable. With the arrival of Marconi and Witham eight clubs competed for the championship and all but Witham fielded a team in the new second division.
Strangely enough, although the concept of four board teams had never been seriously considered for the first division, it was readily adopted for the second. This may have been due to the fact that, initially, the second division was not regarded as having the same formality as the first. In the past, players who had not been selected had, from to time, been tagged on to the end of the team to play their counterparts from the opposing club on a friendly basis, and the same friendly and informal atmosphere was carried forward when competition was regularised into a proper division. Those who had played on a friendly basis were not necessarily the best players available, for the custom had been to offer games to everyone who wanted to play an opponent from another club without regard to playing strength, so sometimes near beginners turned out while players with greater experience stayed at home. This practice, too, was continued into the second division so that, for a while, it offered open house to anybody who wanted to play rather than only to those who qualified on playing ability. Competitive instincts gradually overshadowed this noble concept, but the same high ideals can still be seen today, principally in some of the teams towards the lower end of the third division. Only recently Chelmsford club, for one, succeeded in fielding over the course of a season every single member who had expressed a desire to play. The second division found instant favour with two different categories of player. There were those who had clamoured for a place in the club's team, but who had rarely achieved selection, and there were also those who had often been asked to play but had declined to do so, feeling that their playing ability was not sufficient to enable them to take on somebody in the opposing club's best six. A good example of this type of player could be found at Hoffmanns, whose overall membership supported the fielding of ten players, but not many of the ten felt up to the demands of appearing in the first six. So, although the first division had always represented a struggle, the club had found no difficulty in taking up its place in the second.
In its early days the fixtures in the second division coincided with the first, so that clubs met ten-a-side. Whilst convenient from the point of view of administration, the arrangement tended to stretch available equipment to its absolute limits. Visiting teams were always called upon to bring clocks, and sometimes sets and boards as well. Nevertheless it was not unusual to find one or two games in progress without the aid of a clock, for sometimes the combined resources of the two clubs could not muster ten in working order. Sometimes, too, the visiting club forgot to bring any. The use of clocks was not compulsory, even in the first division, reflecting the fact that newly formed clubs were not fully equipped, and the rules simply provided that clocks had to be used where available. In fact, the rules remained so worded until as recently as 1985. Happily, murmurs of slow play have rarely, if ever, been heard, for those who have played without clocks usually tended to be from the lower ranges of playing strength where moves are often played at quite a fast rate.
The Witham club had been formed with the aid of some counselling from the League, pursuant to the policy of helping to create new clubs in the area. Like the League itself, the club grew rapidly from humble beginnings. In its first season, one match was drawn and thirteen lost, and in all seventeen matches were played before the first win was finally registered. But within a few years the club became a major force both in numerical and playing strength, culminating with the capture of the first division championship in 1973.
The other newcomers, Marconi, were also to enjoy considerable success and were soon to dominate the championship. Happily the club has rarely been troubled by the problems of dwindling membership so often encountered by company clubs, and for much of its life has enjoyed a level of support comparable with rivals whose catchment areas comprise entire towns.
The previous season's arrivals, Essex University and Maldon, also established themselves as League stalwarts, although neither has succeeded in capturing the championship to date. But both made good starts, with the University finishing third in each of its first two seasons and Maldon becoming the first winners of the second division. In those days the first and second divisions were known as Divisions A and B. The numerical suffix did not appear until the formation of the third division in 1976.
1967/68 saw Chelmsford regain the championship from Colchester. Facilities continued to expand. A team was entered in the Postal Chess League, and grading was introduced. Ray Keene, arguably the leading British player of the day, gave a simultaneous display. A League Magazine appeared for the first time, and became an established feature of the League in the years that followed.
Stan Wooller, the Secretary of Hoffmanns, emigrated to New Zealand and received a warm tribute at the A.G.M. for all his efforts during the League's formative years. Stan Wooller's role in the creation and development of the League cannot be understated, for it was he who played a principal part in the establishment of contact between clubs in the area which led to the first meeting in 1964, and it was he who did so much to maintain the Hoffmann Club's membership of the League at a time when its withdrawal might have placed the future of the League itself in jeopardy.
Until now, all clerical duties had been undertaken by the General Secretary, but owing to the expansion of activities the post of Tournaments Officer was created to deal with yet another new venture, an individual championship. Andrew Lait of Marconi was the first holder of the office, and he also dealt with grading. Nineteen players competed in the first individual championship, run on the Swiss system, which was won by Gordon Campbell, a Marconi player who had also played for Chelmsford.
1968/69 saw no further additions to the League's ranks. Representative matches were played against Ilford Chess Club and the Rest of Essex, and the League also staged the Essex & Norfolk county match. The existence of the League had soon become known to those in the south of the County, and these matches reflected the fast growth of contact between the two areas. In fact, about a dozen of the League's players were already playing regularly in County matches at this time. County matches have been played in the League's area ever since, albeit infrequently. Not long after the Norfolk match the League was host to the clash of the titans, Essex and Cambridge, which saw some of the country's leading players assembled together under a North Essex roof. Such an event would have been considered a completely unrealistic pipe-dream only a few years before. Spectators were able to enjoy the sight of Jonathan Penrose, playing against Ray Keene, then the highest graded player in the country. It was well established now that there was something north of Brentwood.



See also: Essex-Suffolk Border League, formation of the NECL, first two years of NECL