Showing posts with label NECL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NECL. Show all posts

Friday, 23 August 2024

Division 1 Summary

Colchester A finished in 7th place (out of 9) in NECL Division 1, with three wins, one draw and four losses (two of the losses were on default).

However, Colchester B finished in 1st place - meaning Colchester have won Division 1 for the first time since the 1996/97 season. It is also the first time ever that the league has been won by a B team. In a very close league, Colchester B won four games, drew three and only lost once. This gave them the same number of match points as Writtle but Colchester had one more board point.





The player statistics (by board) are:

Board 1 (Total 8/14)
Panagiotis Kanellopoulus4/5
Ruqayyah Rida2.5/5
Nathan Barnes1/1
Zia Mohammed0.5/1
Palitha Konara0/1

Board 2 (Total 7/14)
Ruqayyah Rida4/4
Rob Petrovai1/1
Rezin Catabay1/4
Nathan Barnes0.5/2
Zia Mohammed0.5/2
Mike Wagstaff0/1

Board 3 (Total 8.5/14)
Rob Petrovai3/3
Rezin Catabay2/2
Clive Bellinger1/1
Mae Catabay1/2
Zia Mohammed0.5/1
Mike Wagstaff0.5/1
Ian Gooding0.5/2
Andrew English0/1
Palitha Konara0/1

Board 4 (Total 7.5/14)
Dan Thompson3/3
Rob Petrovai2/3
Nathan Barnes1/1
Kitt Simms1/1
Mae Catabay0.5/1
Matt Bennett0/1
Seha Konara0/1
Ed Southgate0/1
Palitha Konara0/2

Friday, 16 August 2019

Colchester B round-up

Colchester B finished in 5th place (out of 10) in NECL Division 1, with three wins, two draws and four losses. This was one place ahead of the A team. In the knockout competition the B team won 4-0 in the first round against Writtle B and then lost on board count to Chelmsford B in the quarterfinal.

The player statistics (by board) are:

Board 1 (Total 7.5/11)
Ian Gooding5.5/8
Michael Catabay1/1
Svein Kjenner1/1
Nathan Barnes0.5/1

Board 2 (Total 6/11)
Michael Catabay5/7
Felix Schnell1/3
Svein Kjenner0/1

Board 3 (Total 4.5/11)
Felix Schnell2.5/5
Mike Clapham1/1
Svein Kjenner1/3
Nathan Barnes0/1
Mike Wagstaff0/1

Board 4 (Total 4.5/11)
Nathan Barnes2/6
Mike Clapham1/1
Emil Tihov1/1
Clive Bellinger0.5/1
Jamie Van Amstel0/2

Monday, 29 July 2019

Colchester A round-up

Colchester A finished in 6th place (out of 10) in NECL Division 1, with three wins, two draws and four losses. Chelmsford A finished in first. In the knockout competition the A team lost (on board count) in the first round against fellow Division 1 side Brentwood A; the A team reached the final of the Plate competition where they lost 2.5-1.5 to Purleigh A. Shaun Munson played his first games for the club this season.

The player statistics (by board) are:

Board 1 (Total 4/13)
Shaun Munson2/4
Michael Catabay1/2
Jan Cesenek1/2
Nathan Barnes0/1
Matt Stemp0/4

Board 2 (Total 6.5/13)
Jan Cesenek2/4
Michael Catabay1.5/3
Matt Stemp1/1
Nathan Barnes1/2
Ian Gooding1/2
Felix Schnell0/1

Board 3 (Total 6.5/13)
Felix Schnell2.5/4
Svein Kjenner1/1
Matt Stemp1/2
Michael Catabay1/3
Mike Clapham0.5/1
Emil Tihov0.5/1
John Duff-Cole0/1

Board 4 (Total 9/13)
Nathan Barnes4/4
Felix Schnell1.5/2
Ian Gooding1/1
Emil Tihov1/1
Mike Clapham1/2
John Duff-Cole0.5/1
Clive Bellinger0/1
Phil Daley0/1

Wednesday, 12 June 2019

Colchester C round-up

Colchester C finished in 6th place (out of 7) in NECL Division 2, with three wins, three draws and six losses. Billericay A finished in first. Mike Clapham played his first games for the club this season.

The player statistics (by board) are:

Board 1 (Total 5.5/12)
Mike Wagstaff2/3
Svein Kjenner1.5/3
Emil Tihov1/3
Mike Clapham0.5/1
Felix Schnell0.5/1
Default0/1

Board 2 (Total 4.5/12)
Mike Wagstaff1.5/2
Emil Tihov1/2
Mark Johnson0.5/1
Felix Schnell0.5/2
John Duff-Cole0/1
Pete Smith0/2
Default0/1

Board 3 (Total 3.5/12)
Felix Schnell1/1
Mike Wagstaff1/1
John Duff-Cole1/3
Emil Tihov0.5/2
Jamie Van Amstel0/2
Pete Smith0/2
Default0/1

Board 4 (Total 3/12)
John Duff-Cole2/4
Clive Bellinger0.5/2
Jamie Van Amstel0.5/2
Mae Catabay0.5/1
Charles Mallon0/1
Pete Smith0/1
Default0/2

Saturday, 1 June 2019

Colchester D round-up

Colchester D finished in 6th place (out of 11) in NECL Division 3, with three wins, three draws and four losses in the league. Brentwood B finished in first, one point ahead of the D team - with Clacton B and Chelmsford E close behind. Charles Mallon and Jamie Van Amstel played their firest games for the club this season. The D team's results were above expectations as they were outgraded in 8 of their 10 matches.

The player statistics (by board) are:

Board 1 (Total 4.5/10)
Clive Bellinger1.5/2
Pete Smith1/1
Jamie Van Amstel1/2
Brian Remmer0.5/1
Emil Tihov0.5/3
John Duff-Cole0/1

Board 2 (Total 6/10)
Jamie Van Amstel3/3
Mark Johnson2/2
Clive Bellinger0.5/1
John Duff-Cole0.5/2
Mae Catabay0/1
Charles Mallon0/1

Board 3 (Total 4/10)
Jamie Van Amstel2/4
Charles Mallon1/1
Craig Bradshaw1/4
Phil Daley0/1

Board 4 (Total 3.5/10)
Charles Mallon1.5/3
Craig Bradshaw1/3
John Duff-Cole0.5/1
Mae Catabay0.5/1
Asci Catabay0/1

Tuesday, 24 July 2018

Colchester B round-up

Colchester B finished mid-table in NECL Division 1 with four wins, one draw and four defeats in the league. Their best results were a 2.5-1.5 win against Chelmsford A, a 4-0 win against Billericay A and a 3.5-0.5 win against Chelmsford B. The B team had a few problems getting players in some of the matches early in the season resulting in a few defaults on board 4.

The player statistics (by board) are:

Board 1 (Total 3.5/9)
Michael Catabay1.5/4
Jan Cesenek1/1
Nathan Barnes1/4

Board 2 (Total 5.5/9)
Michael Catabay1.5/3
Jan Cesenek1/1
Nathan Barnes1/1
Svein Kjenner1/1
Felix Schnell1/3

Board 3 (Total 5/9)
Clive Bellinger2/3
Nathan Barnes1/1
Michael Catabay1/1
Felix Schnell1/2
Svein Kjenner0/1
Pete Smith0/1

Board 4 (Total 5.5/9)
Felix Schnell1.5/2
Nathan Barnes1/1
Svein Kjenner1/1
Emil Tihov1/1
Pete Smith1/1
Default0/3

Sunday, 22 July 2018

Colchester A round-up

Colchester A finished in 3rd place (out of 11) in NECL Division 1 with six wins, two draws and two defeats in the league. Their best result was probably a 3.5-0.5 win against Brentwood A. The A team reached the quarter-finals of the knockout where, fielding no nominated A team players, they narrowly lost to eventual winners Chelmsford A.

It was very close at the top of the table, with Writtle, Chelmsford A and Colchester A all getting 25 board points. Chelmsford and Writtle had an extra match point, with Writtle A winning the title on board count. A single extra half point could have resulted in Colchester winning the title.


The player statistics (by board) are:

Board 1 (Total 7/12)
Matt Stemp5/9
Ian Gooding1.5/2
Nathan Barnes0.5/1

Board 2 (Total 7/12)
Ian Gooding4/6
Norbert Voelker2/3
Jan Cesenek0.5/1
Michael Catabay0.5/2

Board 3 (Total 7.5/12)
Jan Cesenek2/2
Nathan Barnes1.5/4
Norbert Voelker1/1
Felix Schnell1/1
Michael Catabay1/2
Clive Bellinger0.5/1
Svein Kjenner0/1

Board 4 (Total 9.5/12)
Michael Catabay4/4
Nathan Barnes2.5/3
Emil Tihov1/1
Svein Kjenner1/2
Felix Schnell1/2

Tuesday, 12 June 2018

Colchester C round-up

Colchester C finished in 5th place (out of 6) in NECL Division 2 with three wins, one draw and six defeats in the league. Their best results were probably a 2-2 draw against league winners Clacton A and a 3.5-0.5 win against Baddow B. The latter result took place on the same evening as a B team match making it an even more impressive result as they were not able to use the highest-graded player eligible for the C team (as they were playing for the B team).

The player statistics (by board) are:

Board 1 (Total 6/10)
Felix Schnell3/4
Svein Kjenner2.5/3
Clive Bellinger0.5/2
Emil Tihov0/1

Board 2 (Total 4.5/10)
Felix Schnell2/2
Svein Kjenner1/1
Mike Wagstaff1/3
Emil Tihov0.5/2
Clive Bellinger0/1
Pete Smith0/1

Board 3 (Total 3.5/10)
Emil Tihov1.5/2
Clive Bellinger1.5/4
Mike Wagstaff0.5/1
Phil Daley0/1
Brian Remmer0/1
Pete Smith0/1

Board 4 (Total 5/10)
Brian Remmer1.5/2
Clive Bellinger1/1
Emil Tihov1/1
Pete Smith1/3
John Duff-Cole0.5/1
Phil Daley0/2

Thursday, 31 May 2018

Colchester D round-up

Colchester D finished in 2nd place (out of 11) in a closely-contested NECL Division 3, with six wins, three draws and one defeat in the league. Billericay B finished in first, one point ahead of the D team - with Clacton C and Clacton B close behind. The club introduced a D team to try to ensure that all who wanted a game got a game and this has been the main success of the team this year; with 12 people playing in at least one match (including 7 different people playing on board 4). Dom Lee, Emil Tihov, Craig Bradshaw, Asci Catabay and, 7-year old, Mae Catabay all made their competitive debuts for the club.

The player statistics (by board) are:

Board 1 (Total 6.5/10)
Brian Remmer2.5/4
Pete Smith2/2
Emil Tihov1.5/2
Clive Bellinger0.5/1
Mark Johnson0/1

Board 2 (Total 6.5/10)
Mark Johnson2/2
Pete Smith1.5/2
John Duff-Cole1.5/2
Dom Lee1/1
Brian Remmer0.5/1
Phil Daley0/2

Board 3 (Total 7/10)
John Duff-Cole3/4
Dom Lee2/2
Brian Remmer1/1
Pete Smith1/2
Craig Bradshaw0/1

Board 4 (Total 7/10)
Craig Bradshaw2.5/4
Mark Johnson1/1
John Duff-Cole1/1
Dom Lee1/1
Luke Sheppey1/1
Asci Catabay0.5/1
Mae Catabay0/1

Sunday, 11 June 2017

Division 1 round-up

Both Colchester teams in Division 1 finished in the top half of the table. Colchester A finished 4th (6 wins, 1 draw, 3 defeats) with their best results being 4-0 wins against Braintree and Billericay. Overall, the A team have had a great season as they won the knockout competition but their league result was not quite as strong. There were a number of good individual performances - the A team were unbeaten on board 4 and only lost one game on board 3. Matt Stemp won all his games on the top two boards.

Colchester B finished in 6th place (with 5 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses). Their best results were a surprise 3-1 win against Writtle A and a 4-0 win against Billericay. Again there were lot of strong individual results; the B team scored more than 50% on boards 2 and 3.


The combined A/B team player statistics (by board) in the league are:

Board 1 (Total 10/20)
Nathan Barnes4/8
Matt Stemp3/3
Ian Gooding2.5/6
Svein Kjenner0.5/2
Norbert Voelker0/1

Board 2 (Total 10.5/20)
Norbert Voelker2.5/6
Matt Stemp2/2
Svein Kjenner2/2
Michael Catabay1.5/2
Mike Wagstaff1.5/3
Felix Schnell1/4
Nathan Barnes0/1

Board 3 (Total 14/20)
Svein Kjenner5.5/7
Felix Schnell3/3
Norbert Voelker2/2
Mike Wagstaff1.5/2
Nathan Barnes1/2
Matt Stemp0.5/1
Clive Bellinger0.5/2
Phil Daley0/1

Board 4 (Total 12.5/20)
Nathan Barnes5.5/6
Clive Bellinger2/4
Pete Smith1.5/3
Michael Catabay1/1
Felix Schnell1/1
Mike Wagstaff1/3
John Duff-Cole0.5/1
Phil Daley0/1

Below is the finish from the game on board 4 in the Writtle A - Colchester A; tripled pawns aren't always bad. The match finished in a draw.

[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.05.17"] [Round "?"] [White "Barnes, Nathan"] [Black "Forrester, Andy"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "B00"] [Annotator "Barnes,Nathan"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "r3r1k1/p2n1n2/1p1q1p2/3ppNp1/3P2P1/P1PP1P2/3B1Q2/R3R1K1 b - - 0 26"] [PlyCount "38"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] 26... Qf8 $6 {The queen is awkwardly placed here; it looks sensible as it seems to help strengthen the defence around the king but it is almost trapped.} 27. c4 $1 a5 {Best} (27... dxc4 $2 28. Bb4 $1 {[%csl Rc5,Rd6,Re7,Rf8,Rg7,Rh6] Black has to give up a piece as his queen has no where to go.} Nc5 29. dxc5 a5 30. Bc3 bxc5 31. dxc4 $18) 28. cxd5 $14 {White has gone a pawn up, the tripled pawns are actually quite strong as they control the centre of the board.} Nd6 29. Ng3 {Re-routing the knight to e4.} b5 $6 30. Ne4 exd4 31. Qxd4 Ne5 32. Kg2 $16 {Strengthening the defence before carrying on.} Rec8 $2 (32... Nxe4 { was Black's best option, though White still has a nearly winning position.}) 33. Nxf6+ Qxf6 34. Qxe5 {Good enough} (34. Rxe5 {was slightly better than the queen capture} Rc2 35. Rd1) 34... Qxe5 35. Rxe5 Rc2 36. Re2 {with time starting to run out I decided to play simple, obvious moves that maintained the advantage.} (36. Rxg5+ {is clearly the best move.}) 36... Re8 37. Kf2 Kf7 38. Rae1 Ra2 $2 39. Bxa5 $1 Rxa3 40. Bb4 Rxe2+ 41. Rxe2 Ra6 42. Re6 Ra2+ 43. Ke3 Ne8 $2 (43... Nc8 44. Rc6 Ra8 (44... Na7 45. Rc7+ Ke8 46. Bc5) 45. Kd4) 44. Re7+ Kf8 45. Ra7+ 1-0

Tuesday, 30 May 2017

Division 2 round-up

Colchester C finished in 6th place (out of 7) in NECL Division 2; with three wins, four draws and five defeats in the league. Positions 3 to 6 were very close together in this division, so the C team were not far away from finishing 3rd - despite having a low average grade compared to most of the other teams in the division. The team scored particularly well on board 1.

The player statistics (by board) are:

Board 1 (Total 8/12)
Mike Wagstaff5.5/8
Clive Bellinger2/2
Felix Schnell1/2

Board 2 (Total 3.5/12)
Clive Bellinger2.5/7
Brian Remmer0.5/1
Pete Smith0.5/2
Phil Daley0/2

Board 3 (Total 5.5/12)
Phil Daley2.5/4
Pete Smith2/5
John Duff-Cole0/2
Default1/1

Board 4 (Total 5.5/12)
Pete Smith2/3
Brian Remmer1/3
Phil Daley0.5/1
John Duff-Cole0.5/2
Ed Goodman0.5/2
Default1/1

Below is the finish from the game played on board 1 in the match against Braintree B. Black's king is exposed and White takes advantage quickly and effectively.

[Event "League"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.03.15"] [Round "?"] [White "Wagstaff, Mike"] [Black "Delieu, Tom"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C18"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "r1b4r/ppqk1pp1/4p1n1/3pP1Bp/2pP1P1P/P1P3Q1/2P1B1P1/R4RK1 b - - 0 16"] [PlyCount "40"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] [SourceDate "2017.05.29"] 16... Kc6 17. Qf3 $1 {[%cal Re2c4]} b5 18. a4 {renewing the threat} Ba6 19. axb5+ Bxb5 20. f5 $1 exf5 (20... Nf8 21. fxe6 {wins at least a pawn} Nxe6 $2 ( 21... fxe6 22. Qf7 {not the best move, but simple and good enough} Qxf7 23. Rxf7 g6 24. Raxa7 Rxa7 25. Rxa7 Nd7 26. g4 hxg4 27. Bxg4 $18 {the extra pawn and bishop pair mean white is winning easily}) 22. Qxd5+ $1 {the queen can't be taken} Kxd5 $2 23. Bf3#) 21. Qxf5 Raf8 22. e6 Ne7 23. Bxe7 Qxe7 24. exf7 Rh6 ({the bishop is safe} 24... Qxe2 $2 25. Rfe1 $1 Qg4 26. Re6+ {and mate follows in a few moves}) 25. Bf3 Rd6 26. Bxh5 Rf6 27. Qg5 Rxf1+ 28. Kxf1 Qxg5 29. hxg5 Kb6 30. Kf2 Bd7 31. Ke3 Bf5 32. g6 Bxc2 33. Kf4 Be4 34. g3 Ra8 35. Ke5 Kc6 36. Rxa7 1-0

Monday, 29 May 2017

Division 3 round-up

Colchester D finished in 6th place (out of 11) in NECL Division 3, with four wins, one draw and five defeats in the league. Their 3-1 win in the final match of the season moved them up from 9th. The team's best result of the season was probably a 2.5-1.5 win against Braintree C, despite having an average grade 32 points lower than that of their opponents.

The player statistics (by board) are:

Board 1 (Total 4/10)
Phil Daley1.5/2
Brian Remmer1/2
Pete Smith0.5/4
Default1/2

Board 2 (Total 4.5/10)
Brian Remmer1.5/2
John Duff-Cole1.5/2
Pete Smith1/1
Phil Daley0.5/1
Mark Johnson0/3
Default0/1

Board 3 (Total 4.5/10)
John Duff-Cole4/6
Ed Goodman0.5/3
Default0/1

Board 4 (Total 4/10)
Adrian Catrinar2/6
Ed Goodman1/1
Default1/3

Below is a game from the match against the Division 3 winners, Clacton C. Annotations are by Mark.

[Event "NECL Division 3"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.03.14"] [Round "?"] [White "Johnson, Mark"] [Black "Ciorga, Marek"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "D30"] [WhiteElo "113"] [BlackElo "124"] [PlyCount "82"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. g3 c5 5. cxd5 {after the exchanges in the centre my opponent will be left with an isolated pawn to attack.} exd5 { Alternatively} (5... cxd4 6. dxe6 Bxe6 7. Qxd4 {leaves me a pawn up}) (5... Nxd5 6. e4 {gives me nice quick development}) 6. Bg2 Be7 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. O-O O-O 9. b3 {looking to control d4 and stop his pawn advancing, makes sense to put the bishop on b2} Re8 10. Bb2 Ng4 11. Nd4 {I was pleased with this move, putting the knight on a central outpost and blocking both his his bishop and pawn, alternatively} (11. e3 Nxf2 12. Rxf2 (12. Kxf2 $4 Bxe3+ 13. Ke2 Bd4+ 14. Kd2 Bxb2 $19) 12... Bxe3 {this variation looked quite scary at the time. The computer seems to think i am fine but then again it plays much better than I do. Blacks attack looks pretty good to me.}) 11... Nc6 12. e3 a6 13. Nc3 { hitting d5} Nxd4 ({At the time I thought his best option would be} 13... Bxd4 14. exd4 Nf6 {giving up the bishop pair but saving his d5 pawn}) (13... Be6 { loses to} 14. Nxe6 fxe6 15. Qxg4) 14. exd4 Ba7 15. Nxd5 Rb8 16. Rc1 Qd6 17. h3 Nf6 18. Nxf6+ Qxf6 19. Qd2 Qg6 20. d5 $4 {Awful move, opening up the line of his bishop and allowing Qxg3 with a nasty attack on my kingside. I noticed this as soon as I pressed my clock, and spent the next few minutes with my best poker face on.} Rd8 {my opponent either doesnt notice Qxg3 or saw something i didnt} 21. Bd4 {lets try to get rid of that bishop} Bxd4 22. Qxd4 b5 23. Rfd1 Bb7 24. d6 {time to push that passed pawn!!} Bxg2 25. Kxg2 Rd7 26. Rc7 Rbd8 {neither of us apparently noticed that after} (26... Rxc7 27. dxc7 Qc6+ {picks up the pawn}) 27. Qb6 Qe4+ ({obviously if} 27... Rxd6 28. Rxd6 Rxd6 (28... Qxd6 29. Qxd6 Rxd6 30. Rc8+) 29. Qb8+ {both win instantly}) 28. Kg1 h6 29. Rxd7 Rxd7 30. Qb8+ Kh7 31. Qc8 Qe2 32. Rc1 ({At this point it still felt like i should be winning, i thought that} 32. Qxd7 Qxd1+ {would allow a perpetual check, but of course after} 33. Kh2 Qe2 34. Qxf7 {protects the f2 pawn nicely. I should have gone for this!}) 32... Qe6 33. Qxa6 Rxd6 34. Qxb5 { still a pawn up and feeling confident. Surely I can't lose?!} Rd2 {so at this point both a2 and h3 are hanging. Which do i save? The connected passed pawns look too good.} 35. a4 Qxh3 36. Qf1 $2 {a pointless backward move. a5 is much better.} Qe6 37. b4 Qe4 38. Rc4 $4 {god knows what i was thinking here, Rb1 is obvious and much better.} Qd5 39. Qb1+ g6 40. Rc1 $4 {The final mistake and a completely losing move. My plan was to bring my rook to guard f1, freeing up my queen for more active duties. Unfortunately, i have not noticed just how dangerous the semi open h-file is.} (40. Qe4 {would save the game} Rd1+ 41. Kg2 Qh5 42. Qh4 Qd5+ {with a draw by perpetual check}) 40... Qf3 41. Rf1 { protecting f1, now its just a case of pushing those passed pawns..?} Rd5 $3 { Whoops. They are going to count for nothing now, there is no good defence to 42. ...Rh5 and either 43....Rh1# or Qh1#} 0-1

Thursday, 20 April 2017

Colchester win knockout

Colchester A have won the NECL knockout competition for the first time in 12 years. In the first round there was an edgy start as they only beat Brentwood B, a Division 3 side, 2.5-1.5 despite being significantly higher graded on every board. This result was followed by a bye in round 2.

The quarter-finals saw a comfortable 3.5-0.5 win against Witham A, though the individual games were closer than the final score suggests. In the semi-final, Brentwood A played an IM, Richard Pert, on board 1 but wins on the middle boards for Colchester saw them go through on tie break (bottom board elimination).

Writtle A, who had won the competition three times since Colchester's most recent win, were the other team to reach the final. Norbert won his game quite quickly and Matt was definitely better in his game. The last three games went close to time with Matt converting his advantage, on board 1 Ian also won with Nathan drawing on board 4 in a game where the advantage fluctuated throughout.

 

Overall four matches were played by the A team in the knockout. The team won every game on boards 2 and 3 - meaning they would have won the competition even if they had lost every game on boards 1 and 4. The player statistics (by board) for the five players who played in the matches are:

 

Board 1 (Total 2/4)
Ian Gooding2/3
Matt Stemp0/1

 

Board 2 (Total 4/4)
Matt Stemp2/2
Norbert Voelker2/2

 

Board 3 (Total 4/4)
Norbert Voelker2/2
Nathan Barnes2/2

 

Board 4 (Total 1.5/4)
Nathan Barnes0.5/1
Felix Schnell1/3

Tuesday, 14 March 2017

NECL update

There have been a number of excellent results for the club in recent matches. The C team drew 2-2 with Clacton A, despite being out-graded on every board. Felix Schnell won on board 1 with Clive Bellinger and Phil Daley drawing on boards 2 and 4.

The D team went one better with a 2.5-1.5 win against Braintree C even though they were out-graded by more than 30 points on every board. Adrian Catrinar won his first graded game, Brian Remmer won on board 1 and John Duff-Cole sealed the team win with a draw on board 2.

The A team have reached the final of the knockout with a comprehensive 3.5-0.5 win in the quarter-final against Witham A and then drawing 2-2 with Brentwood A in the semi-final but progressing due to wins on boards 2 and 3 from Norbert Voelker and Nathan Barnes. Brentwood A fielded the league's only International Master (Richard Pert) on board 1. The final will be against Writtle A whose semi-final opponents (Braintree B) defaulted 4-0.

Perhaps most surprisingly, the B team beat regular Division 1 winners Writtle A 3-1 with wins for Nathan, Svein Kjenner and Felix on the top three boards. The key parts of Felix's and Nathan's wins from this match are shown below.

Select a game from the pull-down list.

[Event "NECL Division 1 2016/17"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.02.22"] [Round "?"] [White "Barnes, Nathan"] [Black "Moore, John C"] [Result "1-0"] [WhiteElo "156"] [BlackElo "184"] [Annotator "Barnes,Nathan"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "r1bqk2r/p1p2ppp/1nQ5/4p3/2P5/3B4/PP1N1PPP/R3K2R b KQkq - 0 12"] [PlyCount "22"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] [EventType "team"] [WhiteTeam "Colchester B"] [BlackTeam "Writtle A"] 12... Qd7 13. Qe4 (13. Be4 {was the main alternative I considered and is also fine.}) 13... f5 $5 {This pawn sacrifice was the main move I had been looking at before playing Qe4. The computer agrees it is best.} 14. Qxe5+ $1 { Alternative moves are too passive and mean Black has no problems. If anything Black would have a slight edge with his pawns controlling the centre.} Kf7 $1 $11 {The only move that makes the pawn sacrifice work - it allows Black to use his rook and queen on the open files in the centre where White has an exposed King on the e-file and two pieces waiting to be skewered on the d-file.} (14... Kd8 $2 15. O-O-O Re8 16. Qg3 {Black is in trouble with his king stuck in the centre and will soon be more than a pawn down in material.}) (14... Kf8 $2 15. Be2 $18 {White is a pawn up and has more active pieces.}) (14... Qe7 $2 15. Qxe7+ Kxe7 16. O-O-O $16 {Again, White is a pawn up and comfortable.}) 15. Qg3 $1 {White had limited options due to the loose bishop on d3 and the pin threat. I spent a long time checking this move - my original intention after playing 13.Qe4 had been to play Qc3 in this position. Qc3 (and Be2) are okay but Qg3 is better as the queen is actively placed and potential skewers along the e-file prevented.} (15. -- Re8 {[%cal Re8e1] wins queen for rook.}) 15... Re8+ {Slightly better than Rd8 trying to take advantage of the slightly awkward minor pieces on the d-file.} (15... Rd8 16. Nf3 $1 {and the bishop is protected by the knight fork.} Qxd3 $4 17. Ne5+ {[%cal Re5d3,Re5f7]}) 16. Kd1 { The only move that maintains equality.} Bb7 17. Kc2 Rad8 18. Rhe1 $11 Be4 $2 { Threatening to win a piece but this is the losing mistake.} 19. Nxe4 $1 (19. Bxe4 $4 Qxd2+ {and mate will follow soon.}) (19. Rxe4 fxe4 20. Nxe4 h6 $11 { White has sufficient compensation for the exchange sacrifice but no more than that.}) 19... fxe4 20. Rxe4 (20. Bxe4 $2 Qd2+ 21. Kb3 Rxe4 $15) 20... Rxe4 21. Qf3+ $1 {The move that Black must have missed when playing 18...Be4. This zwischenzug is the only move that gives White a winning advantage.} (21. Bxe4 $2 Qd2+ 22. Kb3 Rb8 23. Qxc7+ Nd7+ 24. Bb7 $15) 21... Rf4 22. Qxf4+ Kg8 23. Qe4 {After the dust has settled White is simply two pawns up. White made parts of the rest of the game more complex than necessary but eventually won.} 1-0 [Event "NECL Division 1 2016/17"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.02.22"] [Round "?"] [White "Schnell, Felix"] [Black "Thomson, Phil"] [Result "1-0"] [WhiteElo "155"] [BlackElo "163"] [ECO "B15"] [Annotator "Barnes,Nathan"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "2rr1nk1/1pb2ppp/2p1p1q1/2P5/1P1PQP1P/4B1P1/B5K1/2R1R3 w - - 0 36"] [PlyCount "41"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] [EventType "team"] [WhiteTeam "Colchester B"] [BlackTeam "Writtle A"] 36. Qf3 $1 {Avoiding the queen exchange is best - from here the queen puts pressure on Black's queenside pawns.} Ra8 37. Bb1 {Attacking the queen.} Qf6 38. b5 $1 {White will either win a pawn or get a protected passed pawn.} Ba5 $2 39. Red1 (39. bxc6 $142 $1 bxc6 40. Re2 Rdc8 41. Be4 $18) 39... cxb5 40. Qxb7 { Material is equal but the c-pawn is too strong.} Rdb8 41. Qe4 Qd8 42. f5 Qd5 $2 43. fxe6 $1 fxe6 44. Kh3 $2 {Not necessary, gives Black time to regroup - though White is still best.} Qxe4 $2 (44... Bc7 $142 $1 $16) 45. Bxe4 Ra7 46. d5 Bd8 47. d6 Ra4 48. Bc2 Rc4 49. Bb3 Re4 50. Bd4 g5 51. hxg5 Bxg5 52. Rc2 Rc8 53. c6 h6 54. d7 Nxd7 55. cxd7 Ra8 56. Rc8+ 1-0

Saturday, 18 February 2017

History of the NECL

A number of recent posts have contained material taken from the booklet "History of the North Essex Chess League" by J. R. Priestley. This covers the period from before the NECL was formed in the 1960s to the mid-1980s. The entire booklet can now be read and downloaded from the historical archive which is on the About the club page on this website or by clicking here.

Tuesday, 14 February 2017

NECL Division 2: 1970/71


Final League Table 1970/71

Division 2


P
W
D
L
F
A
P
Colchester
6
3
3
0
14½
9
Maldon
6
2
3
1
15½
7
Wickford
6
3
1
2
11½
10½
7
Witham
6
2
2
2
11
13
6
Marconi
6
2
1
3
10
14
5
Braintree
6
1
2
3
10
14
4
Chelmsford
6
2
0
4
14½
4



Chelmsford dominated the second division in the late 1970's and early 1980's but, as this table shows, things were rather different in 1971.

The match between Colchester and Wickford included two double defaults, which is why the aggregate of game points won and lost by the two totals 22 and not 24.
Colchester finished unbeaten for the second season in succession.

Friday, 13 January 2017

HOCCC: 1966-72 Rapid Development (of the North Essex Chess League) part 3

The material for this post is the sixth extract taken from the booklet "The History of the North Essex Chess League" by J. Priestley.



Ray Keene was elected president of the League, reflecting his visits to give simultaneous displays and his assistance with adjudications. The burden of work which fell upon the shoulders of the General Secretary had become very considerable with the introduction of the knockout competition and the expansion of the championship into two divisions, so separate officers of League Championship Secretary and Knockout Tournament Controller were created to spread the load. The first incumbents were John Standley of Colchester and Gareth Tucker of STL respectively.

Both STL and RAMC withdrew from the championship in 1971/72, and competed only in the Knockout. By so doing, they opened the way for a significant change in the operation of League competitions. Until then, every club had been expected to field its first team in the first division, and to enter the other competitions according to its wishes. But there now followed the rather more logical concept of clubs entering the competitions to which they were best suited. Withdrawal from the championship was a great disappointment for the players of STL, who had performed well enough to finish in mid-table in both of the two preceding seasons, and who on one occasion scored a sensational 5½ - ½ victory over Essex University. The departure of two or three key players was the reason for their enforced retirement from the premier event. Today's players who have been around long enough to have visited STL will remember not only the luxurious playing conditions but also the interesting novelty of a large blackboard on which results were entered as soon as games finished. This could have quite a demoralising effect on visiting teams unfortunate enough to suffer a couple of early reverses!

Voting rights at committee meetings, which had always been vested only in club representatives, were extended so as to include officers. This was a very logical step, as it was the officers who provided much of the continuity, some clubs changing the identity of their representatives fairly frequently.
RAMC departed at the end of the 1971-72 season, as did founder member Hoffmans, who had seen a steady decline in membership and who had latterly been reduced to a playing membership of seven.  Most people playing in the League today are unaware that at one time the whole concept of organised inter-club play in the area probably hinged on the ability of this gallant little club to subscribe to it. Every former club has played its part in the development of the League, but none more so than Hoffmanns. Although never in contention for honours, the club achieved several notable results. At one time or another wins were recorded against every other first division club, with the exception of Essex University, including a famous victory over mighty neighbours Chelmsford.

See also: Essex-Suffolk Border League, formation of the NECL, first two years of NECL

Tuesday, 3 January 2017

NECL Division One: 1966/67

Back in 1967 Colchester won Division One of the NECL, information taken from the History of the NECL booklet used for quite a few of the most recent posts. This was the third season in the competition and the second time that Colchester had won the league.


Final League Table 1966/67


P
W
D
L
F
A
P
Colchester
12
9
2
1
46
26
20
Chelmsford
12
8
1
3
47½
24½
17
Essex University
12
8
0
4
42½
29½
16
Braintree
12
6
2
4
37
35
14
Hoffmans
12
3
2
7
31
41
8
Maldon
12
4
0
8
31
41
8
Coggeshall
12
0
1
11
17
55
1


Full League tables were not published in the League's first two seasons so the above, showing the final outcome in the third season, was the first of its kind. Note that Hoffmanns and Maldon tied for fifth place, as both match points and game points were equal.

Thursday, 29 December 2016

HOCCC: 1966-72 Rapid Development (of the North Essex Chess League) part 2

The material for this post is the fifth extract taken from the booklet "The History of the North Essex Chess League" by J. Priestley.



The League's Individual Championship was divided into two sections, Premier and Challengers, and a total of 26 competed. It remained as two tournaments from then on although the entry did not expand in proportion to the increasing number of players taking part in the team competitions; and in subsequent years was often somewhere around the 20 mark and no higher. Players would meet in their own homes, or at club premises, so that a six round event was likely to require every contestant to make three journeys to an away venue. Journeys could be quite a distance for those living on the perimeter of the League's area, which may explain why the event was not as well supported as might have been expected. Another factor to take into account was that not all the entrants ran cars, especially in the early years. A fairly fanatical degree of enthusiasm was required for a player to take on the travelling commitments to remote places in the depths of winter.  Image the journey by train from Witham to Southminster via Shenfield and Wickford, an itinerary undertaken by Roy Heppinstall in order to play against Maldon's John Dodgson. A Braintree player faced an even more arduous journey, with three changes of train, if paired with the same opponent. It was not until 1984 that anybody had the idea of converting the event into a weekend tournament. Entrants were then only required to undertake two journeys, on successive days, to the venue and could benefit from the competitive atmosphere generated by all the players being congregated together. Certainly the idea was well received, for it attracted some 50 competitors, about double the usual number, and the event has been run in this way ever since.

A strange thing about chessplayers is that they do not seem to socialise with each other to any great extent outside the realms of the game itself. Two players can meet at matches on many occasions over several years, perhaps playing against each other a number of times, yet they are unlikely to meet at any other location and very often each will know very little about the other over and above the way he plays chess.  When the Individual Championship was converted to a weekend tournament it was held at the Sportsman Club in Braintree, where the facilities provided the ideal opportunity for players to get together for activities completely unrelated to chess. Many competitors took full advantage, thus making the event into a useful social gathering as well as a tournament. Any passer-by who happened to see Colchester's Andy Lingard arriving at the venue with snooker cue in hand would probably have needed a lot of convincing that he was there to compete in the area's individual chess championship! By now the Individual was no longer being run as two separate tournaments. Instead it was run as one event with the Challengers Trophy being awarded to the player graded 140 or below who achieved the best score.
League Individual Championship 1968/69
Premier
Points

5
J. A. Dodgson, B. Beavis, A. F. B. Scibor
J. R. Priestley
4
R. Heppinstall
E. Whitehead, A. J. Lait, L. Frain
3
D. R. Gold, K. Lucas
B. J. Hunt, P. C. Elliott
2
D. F. Imrie, F. M. Spiers

Challengers
Points

S. Simpson
P. Lawrence
5
H. A. Travers, C. Vince
V. Goetz
3
P. Hewlett, P. W. Selfe
W. H. Parker
2
C. E. Smith, E. G. Tribe, I. Rumsey
1
S. D. George






Marconi won the championship in 1968/69 to begin a period of domination which extended well into the 1970's. Colchester began a similar period of ascendency in the second division.


In the following season, 1969-70, Wickford and STL joined the League. Wickford had been regarded as prospective members ever since the League was founded, and the eventual arrival of the club brought to fruition the links which had been forged and nurtured over a period of years. The club had joined the Essex League in 1964, but by 1968 the eastern section of that League's third division had been decimated by the withdrawal of Burnham, Ghyllgrove and the Basildon town club. A change of direction had been called for, and the club turned to its old friends in the north for the active competition it so keenly sought. Wickford can claim to have quite a lot in common with Braintree, for not only do both clubs have a solid nucleus of experienced and long serving players quite capable of beating the very best opposition on their day, but also both can justifiably say that playing performance is not accurately reflected in the list of League honours which appears at the end of this book. Such lists are, of course, always about winners rather than those who came close. In their very first match Wickford defeated champions Marconi, their only first division defeat of that season, and went on to finish third. They were also third the following season only two points behind the winners. Often they made a good start to a season, only to fall away later, another characteristic shared with Braintree. Wickford's challenge for honours was, perhaps, strongest in its earliest years of membership when there was no club in the neighbouring town of Billericay. When the chessplayers of Billericay decided the town was quite big enough to support a club of its own some depletion of Wickford’s potential was perhaps inevitable, but always they have remained highly respected opponents never to be taken lightly by the opposition.

The other newcomers, STL, were chessplaying employees of Standard Telecommunications Laboratories, a company based in the far west of Essex at Harlow. The fact that the club's application for membership was so keenly submitted, and received, speaks volumes for the high level of enthusiasm which existed on both sides, for the club faced a journey of at least 20 miles to each away match and a similar journey confronted every other club for the return fixture. As it happened, home and away fixtures were discontinued after the previous playing season, so any given journey was no longer scheduled to take place every season, but every other season instead, which was not quite so daunting. On the other hand, the Knockout Tournament was introduced at this time, so the luck of the draw could cause the same journey to occur twice in the same season, and would inevitably do so for some.

For the first few years the Knockout was run on a similar basis to football's World Cup Finals, with the teams divided into groups and with each group conducted on an all-play-all basis to produce qualifiers for the later rounds, which were run as a straight knockout. Then, as now, the tournament was for teams of four and most clubs entered more than one team. The tournament was structured in this manner so as to guarantee each team a certain number of fixtures before possible elimination, thus compensating for the reduction in the number of championship fixtures resulting from the discontinuation of the home and away system. The tournament threw together players from the entire range of playing strength, and thus offered to second division players the chance to meet first division opponents over the board. This enabled the tournament to take on some of the romance associated with the F.A. Cup, for "giant-killings" soon became a regular feature. 'A' teams were often toppled by 'B' opponents and, now and again, by 'C' category players as well. Even the mighty Chelmsford A once lost to Braintree C. To add even more spice to the event the rate of play was accelerated to 35 moves in 1¼ hours as opposed to the 30 required in the championship. This was designed not only to give the tournament its own identity, but also to reduce the number of unfinished games requiring to be adjudicated.

Nineteen teams competed in the first season. Although the rules provided for tie breaks in the event of 2-2 match results in the Knockout rounds, this did not extend to the final itself. The two finalists, Essex University and Wickford, the latter's strength being a further endorsement of the club's strength in its early years of membership, promptly succeeded in drawing the match and, accordingly, shared the title. This was a remarkable result from the University's point of view, because an unforeseen chain of events obliged them to arrive with only three players and one board was thus lost by default. The rules were later altered to provide for a reply in the event of a drawn match in the final. To date, the amended rule has always produced an outright winner, and the tie of the first season remains unique.

1970 saw arrivals in the form of Writtle and a team from the Royal Army Medical Corps at Colchester. RAMC was another small club owing existence to a temporary preponderance of players in a small community. The club competed for only one season in the championship, where the exploits of leading player Doug Pallett were never going to be enough to disguise the deficiencies in playing strength further down the team. Only six game points were won in the entire season, but as three of them were gained in the same match the indignity of finishing without a single match point was avoided. Writtle also struggled in their opening campaign, but for them a bright future lay ahead. The principal pioneers of Writtle club were Ivor Smith and Len Frain, the league's first secretary who, as a serving police officer, had been stationed at both Braintree and Colchester, and represented both, before moving on to Writtle. He thus had the rare distinction of playing a part in the establishment of two clubs, Braintree and Writtle.
The distribution of honours was becoming very much to a set pattern with Marconi and Colchester carrying off the first and second division championships respectively for the third successive season. Not for the first time, though, the margin of victory for Marconi was game, rather than match, points. Clubs frequently found themselves separated by such slender margins after a whole season of competition. It was often a mistake for a player to concede half a point to his opponent once a match result had been settled, rather than to play on and, if necessary, opt for adjudication. Sometimes, at the end of a season, odd half points so conceded could make all the difference between honours or merely coming close to them. Marconi also won the Knockout in 1970-71 and became the first club to achieve the 'double'. So great was the domination of the club that the feat was promptly repeated in the following season.

See also: Essex-Suffolk Border League, formation of the NECL, first two years of NECL,1966-1972 part 1